~coNtrasT in ME~
"I don’t want previous Thai alumni. I don’t think they were good AIESECers if they didn’t ensure sustainable local leadership development. It is exactly because of them we need to go through all the ‘hassle’ today."
"You have been creating the impact on me since the first day I knew AIESEC, the first meeting at TU 2003, till the latest MC meeting yesterday. so TODAY, I choose to be back in AIESEC and I commit that i do my best on it."
Honestly, i felt angry and sad to read the first one.
And i want to jump so high, smile and be happy when i read another one.
But i can't, i wish i can but i just .. can't.
There seems to be some contrast in those two sentences. But both is about me. (aka. Thailand alumni)
Interestingly one is from AI- the leader in the global arena where i believe that everyone in my country look up to.
Another one is from the current leading team of my own country.
Both are in the same organization that i love the most, AIESEC.
What is the different of AIESEC and AIESEC Thailand?
My leader seems to be heard a lot of saying "that is not AIESEC"
I have been told that the way we are recruting or getting the leader for AIESEC Thailand is not the AIESEC's way.
It makes conflict in my head now.
HUGE Questions occur.
Did i make AIESEC Thailand so bad?
Was I doing wrong all the time?
Is what i am doing is good or what i am doing is gonna make things worse?
Am i qualified as being good AIESECer? am i??
What to do to be able to fully said that
"I was a Good AIESECer and I am a GOOD AIESEC alumni?"
--
xxx



